Within a decade, it may be possible to manipulate babies before their actual conception for attributes, such as how tall they're likely to be, what body type they will have, their hair and eye color, what sorts of illnesses they will be naturally resistant to, and even, conceivably, their IQ and personality type.
If everything can be pretty much crafted in a lab. Is it right to manipulate your offsprings genetic make-up?
When the world first learned about IVF two decades ago, it was horrifying and unnatural to most people. But growing demand has made it socially acceptable, and now anybody who's infertile (or not) is interested in IVF...

I've been watching a lot of Jon&Kate plus 8... and even though the thought of having sextuplets is not the least bit attractive to me. To tell you the truth, I want twins. One boy and one girl. And if I left this to nature....quite frankly, I'd have better odds at spawning a baby with an extra toe.

Since we have no problems with fertility (not that I know of anyway!), we'd use our own genetic material (sperm n egg). And of course, I would opt to have the foetus screened for major genetic illnesses. I think we all should, since such technology is available to us.
But then... the next thing is... if it's ok to manipulate a pregnancy (through IVF) and implant multiple fertilised eggs into my womb, then why not manipulate the aesthetic as well.
When science allows you to choose how your off spring will look and even choose its personality. Would you do it?
Or just leave it to nature? What happens when it comes to a point where everyone with a bit of money opts to give their babies the best start with genetic manipulation (aesthetic or otherwise)... would a plain and genetically unmodified child be like a second class citizen? A blemish in a pool of perfection.
We've seen Gattaca... where Ethan Hawk was born with a heart defect, and was denied so many things because of his wonky genetic thumbprint. Yeah in the movies, he rises above all this, takes Jude Law's identity (genetically unflawed) and goes on to be a pilot. But in reality... how many people would be able to go against such odds. Real life's a bitch really.
.
If I left it to nature, wouldn't my child be at a disadvantage compared to his genetically elite (albeit modified) peers (!).
.
What do you think?
Comments
I really like how you wrote this piece and the Gattaca-remark.you made me really think about it. =)
xx
is my favourtite show on discovery health
it's much better than having to CORRECT something after the baby has been born.
for example caner. or personality disorder. if u can fix such risks in the genetics while it is a foetus, then you should.
what's with all this AU NATUREL nonsense... and "SPECIAL" thingy?? If u help your baby to get the best it can... doesn't mean its no longer special what.
Luckily its not a problem for ,me I;m great looking and a genius lol